PRACTICE SERIES 1 · TEST 7

IELTS Academic Writing Practice Test 7

Visits to four types of tourist attraction · The rising cost of housing

2 writing tasks60 minutes

Before you begin

Complete both tasks. Allow about 20 minutes for Task 1 and 40 minutes for Task 2. Write at least 150 and 250 words respectively. The timer is shared across both tasks.

Original IELTS-style practice material. Not produced or endorsed by IELTS, the British Council, IDP or Cambridge University Press & Assessment. Drafts save in this browser. Use Submit writing below to save your responses for review; no automatic band score is awarded.

60:00Drafts save in this browser until you submit.

WRITING TASK 1

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The graph below shows the number of visits made to four types of tourist attraction in one country between 1990 and 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

Line graph of visits, in millions, to museums, theme parks, historic houses and national parks in one country, 1990–2015

If the graph does not display, use this table. It contains the same information.

Visits (millions) 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Museums 12 14 17 21 24 26
Theme parks 8 11 15 17 16 15
Historic houses 15 14 13 12 12 11
National parks 6 7 9 13 17 22

Open the original visual at full size

Write at least 150 words. Suggested time: 20 minutes.

0 wordsMinimum: 150 words

Drafts are saved in this browser. Use Download my writing to keep a separate copy.

View Task 1 sample response and commentary

Write your own response before opening this example. This is a sample from the book, not a score or assessment of your writing.

The line graph compares the number of visits made to museums, theme parks, historic houses and national parks in one country between 1990 and 2015.

Overall, three of the four types of attraction were visited more often in 2015 than in 1990, with museums becoming the most popular attraction from the late 1990s onwards. National parks showed the most dramatic growth, while historic houses were the only attraction to see a fall in visits.

In 1990, historic houses were the most visited attraction, with 15 million visits, followed by museums with 12 million. However, visits to historic houses fell gradually throughout the period, apart from a brief levelling off between 2005 and 2010, reaching 11 million in 2015, the lowest figure of the four. Museums, by contrast, grew steadily, overtaking historic houses in the late 1990s and more than doubling to 26 million by 2015.

National parks started from the lowest base, at just 6 million visits in 1990. Growth was slow at first, but it accelerated sharply after 2000, and national parks had overtaken historic houses by 2005 and theme parks by 2010, finishing at 22 million, almost four times their original level.

Theme parks followed a different pattern. Their visits roughly doubled from 8 million to a peak of 17 million in 2005, but then declined slightly to 15 million by the end of the period.

Commentary

  • TA: The overview picks out the key trends (general growth, the rise of museums, the dramatic growth of national parks and the decline of historic houses) without listing figures. The body paragraphs support it with accurate data, and every line on the graph is covered.
  • CC: Each paragraph focuses on one or two lines, and the writer moves logically from the attractions that changed places at the top to the fastest riser and then to the line with a different shape. Linking words ("However", "by contrast", "but then") show contrasts clearly.
  • LR: The language of trends is precise and varied ("fell gradually", "grew steadily", "accelerated sharply", "a peak of", "declined slightly", "from the lowest base").
  • GRA: A range of structures is used accurately, including participle clauses ("reaching 11 million in 2015", "finishing at 22 million") and multiplier expressions ("almost four times their original level").
Submit writing

About the book’s sample responses

Original IELTS-style practice material. Not produced or endorsed by IELTS, the British Council, IDP or Cambridge University Press & Assessment.

About these samples: Each sample was written to show a strong response at roughly Band 7.5–8. The band estimates are based on the public IELTS band descriptors. They are a guide only, not an official score, and no certified examiner has marked these responses. Commentary is organised by the four criteria used for IELTS Writing:

Submit your writing

Save both task responses for review. Writing is not given an automatic band score. Name and email are required; phone is optional.